It wouldn't be a presidential primary without a candidate crying. The press is all over Republican Mitt Romney for getting emotional a couple times in the past week Cry me a river, Mitt, once speaking about his religion being more inclusive and once describing a soldier's coffin being returned from the war Real Men Can Cry -- Just not in Public. It all goes back to Sen. Edmund Muskie in 1972, when he challenged William Loeb, the late publisher of the Union Leader, for his critical editorials. Here's how David Broder described it:
"With tears st
reaming down his face and his voice choked with emotio
n, Senator Edmund S. Muskie (D-Maine) stood in the snow outside the Manchester Union Leader this morning and accused its publisher of making vicious attacks on him and his wife, Jane. ... In defending his wife, Muskie broke down three times in as many minutes -- uttering a few words and then standing silent in the near blizzard, rubbing at his face, his shoulders heaving, while he attempted to regain his composure sufficiently to speak."
It's been dredged up time and again since: Did he or did he not cry? And, in the political realm, whether or not it makes a candidate look weak or human. For Romney, some of the spin went, it made him look less robotic. And so on. It's a slippery slope, regardless of gender and the tear-producing issue Yes, there's crying in politics. In 2004, I stood quietly by at MaryAnn's Diner in Derry, as Democrat John Kerry teared up. A genuine moment for his supporters, however, was cast as crocodile tears in several articles. In that campaign moment 35 years ago, Muskie said he wasn't crying. He said he had snowflakes in his eyes. He wasn't melting down; the snowflakes were. Whatever. But the candidates should know, New Hampshire has a few more snow storms before the first primary ballots are cast Jan. 8.