Clinton jujitsu: a method developed in Arkansas of defending oneself without the use of weapons by using the strength and weight of an adversary to disable him. This
skill in Hillary and Bill Clinton helps understand how Hillary Clinton is attacking Barack Obama this week over the train wreck Michigan and Florida nominating contests. The states held their primaries in defiance of Democratic Party rules, leaping ahead of the early and traditional states. Clinton won Michigan and Florida, and wants those delegates seated at the national convention in Denver. But the DNC stripped the states of their delegates for their violation. There have been talks of do-over primaries and mail-in votes, all of which are more complicated than they at first appear. Democrats behind Clinton argue their party cannot afford to disenfranchise voters in those key states. Democrats behind Obama argue the results from those two states are skewed, especially in Michigan, where Obama and John Edwards, among other major candidates, were not even on the ballot. Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said yesterday,
When it comes to the Michigan and Florida primaries, Senator Obama seems to only be capable of saying no: No to honoring the January elections, no to holding a new primary vote, no to a vote by mail. The only thing he seems to be for is divvying up delegates in a way that doesn't reflect the will of the electorate. Senator Clinton disagrees with solutions that exclude voters and believes there should be new primary elections in Florida and Michigan if the January votes can't be honored. It is unacceptable to disenfranchise the voters who participated in January and if Senator Obama allows that to happen, there will be implications for Democrats in the general election.
Obama calls Clinton "disingenuous" regarding this latest argument. Clinton contends Obama previously violated the
early-state pledge. Here's her campaign statement from Jan. 21, 2008:
"The Obama campaign today began airing paid television advertisements in a national cable buy that include advertising in the state of Florida. There is no question that these ads are a clear and blatant violation of the early-state pledge that Senator Obama and the other leading Democratic candidates signed last year. The early state pledge was crystal clear in its prohibition against any kind of campaign activity (outside of fundraising) in states that do not adhere to the DNC calendar. There is no ambiguity. Among the list of prohibited activities are “electronic advertising that reaches a significant percentage of the voters in the aforementioned state.” The Obama campaign knows this, but has chosen to violate the pledge regardless.
Just last week the Obama campaign snubbed the people of Florida in a memo that stated that Florida did not matter in the nominating process. After consecutive losses in New Hampshire, Michigan and Nevada, they appear to be changing course. Senator Obama’s flagrant disregard for the pledge that he signed is disturbing and calls the integrity of the pledge into question."
If Obama has violated the early-state pledge, Obamaphiles say it stands to reason that Clinton herself has violated the pledge. The last paragraph of that four-state pledge, which touts respect for the DNC nominating calendar established a year before, reads:
THEREFORE, I _______________, Democratic Candidate for President, pledge I shall not campaign or participate in any state which schedules a presidential election primary or caucus before Feb. 5, 2008, except for the states of Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina, as “campaigning” is defined by rules and regulations of the DNC.
Campaigning is one thing, participating quite another. In hindsight, it looks like Clinton was a participant of some degree against the formidable "uncommitted" on the ballot. In hindsight, it sure looks like some Clinton jujitsu is in play. Obama is not only off message more than he'd like, the guy's on his heels yet again.